Search:

Is the Bottom-Up Bailout Solution a Good Rescue Plan?

We all know that the bailout plan failed because the public is pissed off and would rather take a short-term financial beating themselves than reward the power elite who have been fleecing us for decades. The public is sick to death of trickle-down economics, and the outcry was just too loud for representatives to ignore.
So congress needs to figure out a way of getting cash back into the credit market in a fashion that is quick and fair to the public. So, here it is:
We should take the $700 billion and simply pay down the mortgages of all the homes purchased between certain dates, (let's say 2000 when real estate prices started going berzerk and 2006, when they really started falling). That's it. Simple.
Alright, I realize it isn't that simple, and I anticipate some of the issues below, but first, let's take a look at how this resolves the problem.
I did some poking around at the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) website and discovered that there were roughly 26 million homes sold between 2004 and 2007. Now let's estimate that there were about 35 million sold between 2000 and 2006 (pretty rough estimate, but in the ballpark, I'm sure). Dividing into the $700 billion, that comes out to an average of about $20,000 per home. With an average home value of $200,000, that means about 10% of the home value. Are we on track?
So if you bought a home for $200K, the Bailout Commission writes a check for $20K that gets applied straight to your mortgage. You paid $500K, your mortgage holder gets a check for $50K, etc. So the first thing that happens is the lenders are all of a sudden flush with cash. They pay their obligations. The credit markets unfreeze. Financial institutions get back to business. (Hopefully not as usual).
Meanwhile, you're content, right? You may not have received cash to spend but your mortgage is reduced significantly. If you bought a home during those years you're probably still in the red, but not as much as before. So you'll still have to take some hits, but it will definitely soften the blow. You're less likely to foreclose and you feel more hopeful for the future.
Wait, before everybody starts ripping the idea to shreds, I'll write some of the potential objections that come to mind:
1. It's Socialism! - Yeah, I guess it is. And there will definitely be some idealogues who will object to it on that level. But somehow I think those objections will come from the people who don't benefit from the plan. I have a feeling the 40 million or so families who get those mortgage payments will be able to live with it.
2. It's not fair! What about all the people who bought homes before 2000? - Give me a break! You've enjoyed six years of super-low interest rates and hyper-appreciation. And now you want this mortgage reduction too? In the name of fairness? Please. And as for those who bought after 2006 when the market was already falling, well, I'm sorry, but that was just too dumb. You don't deserve a break.
3. What? It's too complicated. How do we decide who gets how much? - We may need to figure out and come up with some formulas, but I actually think it will be fairly simple. It's just a flat percentage of the purchase price of the home right across the board.
What other some other objections do you see with this bottom-up bailout plan? Let me know! And if everyone else thinks this is as simple and effective as I do, let's push it on our representatives.
My disclosure: In the interest of full disclosure, I should divulge that I am among those who would benefit from this mortgage reduction plan, so I do have an agenda, but at least it isn't a hidden one.

Article Source: http://www.articleadventure.com

The Building of the Beast is a blog for serious discussion about the future of human civilization. Is the financial meltdown the beginning of end of the world as we know it? What is the likelihood of a nuclear war, a modern day holocaust or an ancient Mayan doomsday? If you think major changes are coming, you need to check out the BuildingOfTheBeast.com.

Please Rate this Article

Not yet Rated